Black, 46 dlr 583 (onca, 1918), agreeing not to take a certain plot in a cemetery was considered to be sufficient consideration giving a right to sue on a bona fide claim has been deemed to be adequate consideration. (a) consideration need not be adequate, but must have some value discuss (b) lionel borrowed from tracy, a local builder, a cement mixer in order to lay the base for a greenhouse he planned to build in his garden. Consideration need not adequate but must be sufficient introduction there are five elements to a contract these are offer, acceptance, consideration, intention to create legal relations and capacity. Generally, the courts will not reform a contract because one party made a bad bargain but if the contract appears to be entered into under duress, there may be questions about whether there is adequate consideration.
According to the law, consideration for a contract must be sufficient but it need not be adequate explain what this means and what it is so first of all, in order to make a contract, there have four elements that compulsory. Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate mountford v scott (1975) paid $1 for an option to purchase a house – deem good consideration chappell v nestle (1960) three wrappers from the defendant’s chocolate - deem good consideration. The consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate - ie it is still possible to make a bad bargain the avoidance of a disbenefit might be sufficient, assuming there is no duress or fraud. When courts review past consideration, the key issue is usually whether the consideration was sufficient consideration must be something promised for the present agreement.
It means that although consideration must provide some benefit to the promisor or detriment to the promisee, these do not however have a great deal providing something is given in return for a. The indian contract act 1872 - consideration part 6 by advocate sanyog vyas - duration: 22:57 sanyog vyas law classes 152,599 views. Chappell & co ltd v nestle co ltd  ukhl 1 is an important english contract law case, where the house of lords confirmed the traditional doctrine that consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate. Sufficient is an adjective that is very close in meaning to adequate, but with sufficient, you are not worried if you find a property sufficient to meet the requirements of your family, you are inclined to buy it and move in. Consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate as long as its legally sufficient (within cl) then it doesn’t have to be anything other than nominal consideration the fact that its trivial or nominal doesn’t matter.
A) consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate this rule was originally conceived in pinnel's case and affirmed in chappell & co ltd v nestle co ltd , where three chocolate wrappers were considered good consideration, despite their low economic value. Consideration, which must be given in order to make a contract legally binding, is legally sufficient and bargained-for value, given by the promisor in return for the promisee performing or refraining from performing some act which results in a detriment to the promisee and/or a benefit to the promisor. 1 it is necessary to distinguish consideration from a condition or motive 2 consideration must move from the promisee 3 consideration may be executory or executed but it may not normally be past 4 consideration must be sufficient but it need not be adequate 5 party payment of a debt is not normally good consideration. • e consideration must be sufficient – consideration must provide some benefit to promisor or some detriment to promisee, but benefit or detriment need not amount to much. • consideration must be sufficient but it need not be adequate: adequacy and sufficiency of consideration is a very confusing statement for a layman because in general terms we would expect.
以下部分引自某顿教材和bpp: considerarion must “be sufficient but need not be adequate” 对价必须是有价值的，没有必要充分相当. Consideration does not have to reflect the value of the promise (need not be adequate) for example, a promise to buy an item for less than its actual value may be acceptable however, the promise must be legally sufficient, which means it must be something that the law regards as being capable of amounting to valid consideration. Notwithstanding these views, the doctrine of consideration was further developed along with several rules such as consideration must be sufficient but it need not be adequate, past consideration is not good consideration and consideration must move from the promisee. In these contracts, a recital that the consideration is sufficient should be included, because it's not self-evident that a bargained-for exchange has taken place additional information for more tips on putting your agreement in writing, check out nolo's article contracts 101: make a legally valid contract.
Consideration must move from the promisee but need not flow to the promisor consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate    consideration cannot be illusory. Lastly, consideration must be sufficient, but need not be adequate thus, consideration needs to pass a minimum threshold to be legally sufficient, but doesn’t have to be commercially adequate thus, consideration needs to pass a minimum threshold to be legally sufficient, but doesn’t have to be commercially adequate. Consideration must be sufficient, but not necessarily adequate this means it must be something of value however, consideration doesn’t need to be proportionate value to the promise.
Valuable consideration does not necessarily have to be equal in value to what is received, and it need not be translatable into dollars and cents it is sufficient for the consideration to consist of a performance or a promise to perform that the promisor (the person making the promise) regards as having value. This video is unavailable watch queue queue watch queue queue.
What is the statement ‘consideration must be sufficient but need not be adequate’ means that consideration must be sufficient in law [however need not be adequate but. Consideration must be sufficient and need not adequate for a consideration to be valid, the consideration must be sufficient or sometimes defined as valuable or real the consideration must be sufficient meaning that it must be something in value in the context of law. Need to report the video consideration must move from the promisee contract law - consideration must be sufficient but part 4 c of 7 - duration: 6:27.